Cursor
Worth-Joining Index · Scorecard
v2.1 ALPHA · 2026-08Career Score
—/100
Coverage
65%
Verified
0%
Stage cohort
Late
Vibe Check
🎪 community voting coming soon
Latest valuation
$29.3B (Series D, 2025-11)
Traction · Key numbers
Funding
Rounds
4
Valuation pace
$400M post
$2.3B
Series D · 2025-11 · valuation $29.3B post (Series D, 2025-11) · led by Accel, Thrive Capital, Andreessen Horowitz (continuing), Coatue, NVIDIA, Google (new)
With: Thrive Capital, a16z, Accel, DST Global, NVIDIA, Google · Announced with ARR over $2B, 1M+ paying users, 70% of Fortune 1000 as customers
$900M
Series C · 2025-06 · valuation $9.9B post · led by Thrive Capital
With: Accel, a16z, DST Global
$105M
Series B · 2024-12 · valuation $2.6B post · led by a16z, Thrive Capital
With: Benchmark
$60M
Series A · 2024-08 · valuation $400M post · led by a16z, Thrive Capital
▸Valuation rose over 70x in 15 months across four rounds ($400M → $29.3B) — extreme conviction in AI coding as a category from the capital markets
▸Thrive Capital has doubled down across three consecutive rounds (B/C/D), the most committed insider
▸Coatue leading the D round signals late-stage growth funds stepping in after early risk capital, a shift toward an IPO-track posture
Founders
Michael Truell CEO
MIT dropout; previously built a coding-competition game and interned in computational chemistry
Sualeh Asif Chief Product Officer
From Karachi, Pakistan; International Math Olympiad competitor; MIT
Arvid Lunnemark Co-founder
MIT-educated co-founder
Aman Sanger Co-founder
MIT-educated co-founder
Reality · Working here
Signals & Risks
Editorial ✎
Good fit for
· Elite systems engineers with compiler/IDE internals background — the job is squeezing performance and model orchestration at extreme scale
· People who thrive in high-intensity, high-visibility environments — the growth and attention are phenomenal, and so is the pressure
· True believers in the AI-assisted coding paradigm who want to be at the front of this shift
Not for
· Anyone wanting a steady pace — with valuation and ARR growing this fast, the org and expectations are constantly shifting
· Anyone uncomfortable with the structural risk of depending on third-party LLM APIs and wanting a fully self-owned stack
Ask in the interview
1. Valuation grew 70x+ in 15 months — internally, is this seen as sustainable growth or market-sentiment-driven?
2. Given the dependency on OpenAI/Anthropic/Google model APIs, what's the concrete plan for bargaining power and margin pressure?
3. GitHub Copilot, Windsurf, and model providers' own coding assistants are catching up fast — what's Cursor's actual moat: distribution, data flywheel, or something else?
Data changelog
Community corrections → editorial review → applied, fully on the record
data as of 2025-11 · Source: Cursor company blog ↗
data as of 2025-11 · Source: Cursor company blog ↗
Want to talk about this company?
Community members may work here or have interviewed — corrections and additions welcome too
Join the discussion