v2.1 ALPHA · 2026-08Scores move only with public rules + data · never pay-to-play

Worth-Joining Index

"Is this startup worth joining?" — broken into 6 pillars and 12 checkable metrics, scored 0–100 by published rules. Every score is clickable, all the way down to raw sourced data.

Reading these numbers

Full methodology & rubric →

Missing data is never a penalty

Unknown fields drop out of the denominator instead of scoring zero. Low coverage means we need insiders to fill the gaps — not that the company is weak.

Compare inside a cohort, not across

Scale and efficiency metrics structurally favour later-stage companies, so ranks are given per cohort. A growth-stage 80 and an early-stage 60 are not the same measurement.

Alpha — expect movement

Weights and underlying data are still being tuned, so positions shift between editions and some fields aren't independently verified. Every fact links to its source; check anything a decision rests on.

93 companies · click any row for "why this score"
🌱 Early stage44ARR < $20M (or unknown with rounds ≤ Series B)
Not ranked yet — too much missing data?
🌿 Growth stage14ARR $20M – $150M (or Series C/D)
Not ranked yet — too much missing data?
🌲 Late stage35ARR > $150M (or ≥ Series E / Pre-IPO)
Not ranked yet — too much missing data?

A company missing from the index?

The index only covers companies we've researched, so absence means nobody has done the work yet — not that a company scored badly. Nominate one and the community will research it against the same rubric. Nominating never buys a better score, and there are no paid placements.

Nominate a company

Disclaimer: some data is company-claimed (◆) or third-party estimated (~) and not independently verified; provenance labels ship with every score. Scores are an editorial synthesis of joining value — not investment or employment advice. Found a data error? Tell us.