Correct Whatnot's data

You can correct facts — you can't negotiate scores

Review process: email verification → editorial review → accepted changes recorded per provenance rules, with scores recalculated automatically by the public rubric. Public evidence earns ✓, official info verified via a company email earns ◆, insider info earns ◐ — every step stays in the company's change log. You'll get the review outcome by email.

Which field needs correcting?

Include currency and basis (ARR vs run-rate vs bookings); numeric = $M value

Submission type

Correct an errorthe current data is wrongFill in an unknownfill a field marked “unknown”Flag as disputedsomething's off but I can't share a number

What's the correct information?

Numeric value (optional — used for scoring tiers)

As-of date (YYYY-MM)

Public evidence link (optional — but needed for a ✓)

Want the ✓ Publicly verifiable tag and the best scoring tier? Get the number into a public source and we'll cite it directly. Employee / official info without a public source is handled as ◐ / ◆. Please don't submit anything that breaches a confidentiality obligation — we'll reject it.

Who are you?

Employeeverify with your work email for the ◐ tagCompany officialfounder / official — counted as ◆ company-claimedCommunity membermember of the groupVisitorsharing a public lead

Email (click-to-verify required; employees / officials, use your company email)

Only used for verification and the review reply — never public, never displayed. A domain matching Whatnot's website automatically passes work-email verification.

Notes (optional)

The rule: you can correct facts, not negotiate scores — scores only change with the data and the public rubric.